On The Edge of Something Great



In 2015, I wrote the following words about Elena Eremina, a junior, performing at EYOF: "I think Elena is such a strong all around prospect for Russia. I'm not at all deterred by her not making AA finals here. If anything, I don't really want her to be a superstar junior because those don't turn out so well in Russia. She needs to mature as a competitor and not balk when it matters. She has time." There's also an entire piece I wrote, "Let's Talk About Lena," predicting what 2017 might look like for her.

Here's what I wrote in 2015 about Anastasia Iliankova and Elena, both sent to Japan Junior, an unofficial junior Worlds for the best AAer's: "I hope in two years, when the next Japan Junior occurs, Elena and Anastasia will be successful seniors."

My thoughts in 2016 on Angelina Melnikova: "Angelina is one of the best All-Arounder's Russia has and I'm hoping she'll age like wine. If we consider her normal scores, then we have a frontrunner for the 2017 AA podium. I'm definitely not predicting things.  I'm just saying if she's healthy she should be on the shortlist, and held in the same esteem, as whichever Americans will be vying for the title."

Wow.



What a tremendous honor it's been to have spent a week witnessing three of last quad's brilliant juniors find their bearings at their first Word Championships. Going through my archives has me in tears when I consider all the hopes we had for these girls. I honestly can't believe we've been so lucky to have this team represent Russia in a post Olympic year, when everything usually goes to shit. Four years ago, there didn't seem anything optimistic to take away from Worlds except what Aliya achieved. This feels different. Montreal is different. I look at each of our girls and can't see a thing that makes me ashamed. Each of them are a work in progress and I actually believe that that progress is real and can be accomplished!

She's Humble Enough. She's Hungry Enough.

Anastasia Iliankova was first covered on this blog when I detailed her unique bars routine at EYOF in 2015. There she placed behind compatriot, Daria Skrypnik, and now she's 4th best in the world on the apparatus. Fourth best with an error so large it cost her the title. She's shown neither regret or a willingness to reminisce on what is already behind her. She's returning home to add harder skills, more risky connections, and win what rightfully belongs to her if her execution remains as it is. Calm but confident, Nastia's not letting others outwork her for the medal she wants. I'm excited to see what her bars look like next year but I'm also curious about what strategy she and her coaches will take in regards to maintaining her health and attempting to do AA. Ilya did her job at Worlds and that's all we asked of her.

Success Is A Decision


Most of us consider the London quad a golden age because we saw the rebirth of Russian gymnastics after a near eclipse during the Beijing era. If Aliya's 2010 win is the standard we set for our girls, we should also admit that no one falls onto the top of the podium- it's a climb that can take months, most often years. When I used to talk about Lena I sensed that people liked her but were unimpressed because she didn't rise up and dominate. I'm glad to see we're all crammed in the same boat now. I'm so proud of this two time world medalist. I think she's fallen in competition four times total this year and none at all at Worlds. Can we cryogenically freeze her and unthaw her in 2020? Her final beam routine was hampered by a bad dismount off the mat but we've finally gained a consistent beam worker so that's the positive takeaway. I'm worried about how scores will be for next year in a TF situation and I hope that Lena uses her first Worlds as a lesson to take out things that make her uncomfortable under pressure. She did that with the loso mount after Euros and I think she has to once again examine what is and isn't working. Barring the dismount, it would've scored another 13+ so the judges like her and I'd definitely have her in the beam lineup next year. Eremina was overshadowed by Melka and Tutkhalyan's junior careers and didnt start this year as the senior to beat. Yet she forfeited a European and World title because of one mistake each time, which hints at a future that could be golden if she can do everything right. Elena takes responsibility for her results and I think it gives her a feeling of control over her mistakes and how to approach the same problem next time. So on to the next time you bright young thing!

Miss Congeniality

Angelina, poor snow angel, did not give the performance expectations asked of her. I wonder what her own expectations are because she seems lacking in direction. She rolled her ankle before Worlds, and while that injury is the cause of her current predicament, I think she's in a dangerous place if she cannot impress next year. I'm exasperated by all her injury related performances and I've grown to worry about how much this losing streak might settle into a resigned mindset (something she denies on IG, thank god). What is hindering her will eventually haunt her if her training regimen is not overhauled and new coaches brought in. Despite hoping for the best, I figured her AA would go the way it did because she looked similar in PT. I accept that when she's injured she's not the type of gymnast to "dig deep." I intend it more as a compliment to those who can than a criticism to one who can't. People like Aliya and Maria can do big gymnastics even when they have big hurdles in their way and equally talented people, like Vika and Gelya, can't. Angelina needs to be healthy to feel confident in her abilities and that's not an unfair demand. We want our gymnasts to always have a clean bill of health, but pragmatically that can't always be the case, so finding out who's dependable under rotten circumstances will be a dilemma this quad. I'm proud of Gelya's public statement that she will double down in training and regain what she has lost. I was so relieved to see her enjoying herself in the AA and I want to thank Paseka so much for keeping her happily occupied. What's done is done and at least she made friends and filled her memories with those happy moments instead of holing up in the hotel being dejected about things she cannot change. With no competitions after the AA, she took everything she could from the Worlds experience. And god, I had no idea how well loved Gelya is! The camaraderie that emerged this year was more genuine and vivid than I've ever witnessed amongst competing nations.


So that's how I feel about our young team sent to Worlds, and led by our brazen and beautiful team leader, Maria Paseka. At Universiade she was very condescending about her role but I think she's done a wonderful job of being a friend, a mentor, even a coach, to her younger teammates. You can tell her cheery presence puts them at ease.

Image may contain: one or more people, child and outdoor
Comforting Lena after silver is confirmed


I think our team did as best they could given the circumstances each of them was faced with. Three girls injured (though they all say they're ok) and yet everyone qualified to a final, they took one gold medal, and were serious threats in two more. Well done for a post Olympic Worlds. 2018 is gonna be killer with the return of Aliya, and mayyyybe Vika for 1 month lol, and tons of additional depth from Shekoldina and Simakova, not to mention Kharenkova and Perebs. So a last comment on how our girls did at Worlds: it could've been better but it could've been worse. Yes, Gelya's whole meet was shocking, yes we wanted a Russian to win UB and AA, and neither of those things happened. But it's Year One. The next three years are going to reveal development of the strengths we saw this year, strengths which already put them in finals. So don't worry, this team has a lot of ups and downs to go through but the highs will be worth the lows. Adapt this as your mantra for Russia: Everything is going to work out in the end. If it's not working out, it's not the end.

We'll be back to Worlds and stronger.
Image may contain: 3 people, people on stage

Comments

  1. Just read your "lets talk about Lena". Om point! She teased us with the nabieva.. and now she connects it to a pak and chow 1/2. Our girl is amazing! I hope for Eremina, Simakova, Klimenko and Afanaseva for Tokyo, and Aliya and possibly Paseka for specialists (although i'm not sure about the rules for team/specialists).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have never made such an accurate prediction about any junior. But she was so quiet and dedicated, I figured it was safe to have hopes. How did it all work out so well? Aaaah!

      I can't make any predictions until I see all the major contenders at Nationals. I'm so ready for 2018.

      I have a good feeling about Klimenko, same as the one I had about Elena.

      Delete
  2. Eremina & illyankova are still in the thin slight body stage & it's what Russia has worked with before. The criticism of Ru Wag by the new sports minister is that they are relying on USSR techniques . They must learn to work with more muscled , bigger more mature bodies . Melnikova is very much like Pavlova who they couldn't adjust their style to either ( esp on bars) . This also reminds me of the 2006 jnr champ who baulked at the vault in 2007 & did very well in Beijing . However they threw her out in 09 because she was no longer the sylph tiny thing . She didn't want to go .

    They must relearn everything with Mustafina / Kharenkova ( who suddenly has legs And stability) / E. Afanseyeva & apply it to Melnikova . Gelya has a figure which means amongst other things big hip angle to knee changes affecting leaps & landings . ( hence the hamstring injury in 2016) . I feel they are working her a bit too hard before she has grown the strength to match her new angles .

    We cannot predict what development changes are ahead , but we need to give the girls time to grow . Only half of the elite ranks will be able to adjust . Injuries happen when girls are kept 'young & tiny' also .

    ReplyDelete
  3. Btw just as a comparison to 09 0r 13 , if there was a full team this year Russia would have won imo . They swould have had Eremina Melnikova Paseka Akhaimova Illyankova & Kharenkova .That is z stronger team than 2015 & maybe even close to 2016 .

    ReplyDelete
  4. (Removed my original post because I forgot to add some stuff on) I'm so excited for 2018!! It's gonna be awesome to see Eremina, Melnikova, Ilyankova, Komova, Mustafina, Kharenkova, Perebinosova, Afanasyeva, Simakova, Shekoldina, Akhaimova and Paseka all competing with one another. I'm so stoked to see how the lead-up to 2018 Worlds go. Super excited to see Klimenko turn senior in 2019 too!!!

    I'm most excited to see the battle between Paseka, Afan and Akhaimova. I do hope Masha takes a break to just rest and heal up before coming back mid 2018. In that time I'd like to see how Eleonora and Lilia look (I heard both are training Amanars which is exciting and they have great difficulty on floor).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paseka has plans to see a doctor so I think she'll follow whatever advice they give, especially since 2018 Euros won't be til August. So there's nothing absolutely urgent preventing her form resting and healing for a few months.

      I'm super excited about E. Afan and Akhaimova! A team is always made stronger when each member is improving, regardless of whether they gain upward mobility through the ranks. A team where everyone is upgrading means DEPTH. The best results come from having the best options to build a team :)

      Delete
  5. I honestly have no idea what to think about Melnikova from this. It was mainly floor that was terrible - she had mistakes elsewhere, especially during the AA, but they weren't meltdowns and her on-screen mentality looked positive and relaxed (although we only saw the first two routines before the floor disaster). It can't be denied though that she is not a natural competitor. Really makes me wonder about the rumors with her coaching changes this year. I think she needs someone who can devote the majority of their support and attention to her, and if rumors are to be believed it seems she did the opposite.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gelya either finds the thought of a sports psychologist useless or offensive because she brushed off the suggestion that one might help her. I find it ironic that she, among others, cite Simone Biles for her stability and confidence and wonder how many of them know that Biles regularly went to a sports psychologist in 2013 and 2014. It's not a shameful thing but I worry that in Gelya's mind she thinks it is :(



      Delete
    2. Late reply, but I saw that and found it interesting that people in the vk group immediately brought up the fact that Rita and Zaripova have been open about the fact that they sought out a sports psych when it was clear their approach wasn't working, and how much it helped. I had the same thoughts - I'd hoped that with RG being a more visible sport this might be a good closer-to-home example than Simone seeing one, but :/

      Delete
  6. What do you think about the interview Seda Tutkhalyan has recently given to MatchTV? The things she said about Lena were very hard, at least in the translation. Do you think she is afraid to loose her spot on the national team?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What did she say? Is there a link? I would love to read it. Thanks!

      Delete
    2. http://eng.gymnovosti.com/tutkhalian-eremina-got-lucky-in-the-all-around/

      She said Elena won medals becuz she's just lucky

      Delete
    3. I think that Seda is wrong. You could also say that Hurd got lucky because Lena had the mistae on bars, and that Black got lucky with that beam and bars scores. So it was realistic for Eremina to get bronze even with Iordache and Ragan Smith not being injured.

      Delete
    4. Thank you for the link! I disagree with Seda too. Eremina had the highest beam score of the AA and a really good floor score. She improved on beam and floors from quals, so I don't think it was luck. This was a weaker field that last year, but she didn't fall. Maybe Seda feels left out; I hope she get back into shape and shows what she can do in the future.

      Delete
    5. I totally agree with you! Also, if you were to take the COP from 2013-2016, Lena would have gotten about 14,2-ish on Vault, about the same score on ub probably (I don't know how it is with the new connection bonuses tbh but it seems fair to me), about a 13,6 on beam and a 14,4 (!) on floor. I don't think that Seda had better results last quad, so I don't really get why she should feel the need to talk bad about scores equal to hers, I mean that downgrades her too. Maybe she is afraid because she is still recovering from injury and feels like the fifth wheel right now. Hopefully she will see it as a challenge to come back and not as a matter of good/bad luck!

      Delete
    6. Seda could have been beam medllist in 15&16 plus Olympic AA bronze & several lesser comps but she always fell . Elena id not fall . That is the difference .

      Delete
    7. You name it - maybe she was capable of scoring higher than 13,6, but she rarely did so because she fell 90% of the times and EVERY time when it mattered (finals). She has no international medals on beam so it's around a 13,6 for her with a fall, but this 13,6 is the scoring reality for her. Maybe Lena could also do a more difficult routine on beam but decided not to do so because she didn't wanted to risk falling all of the time (for example her loso mount). And it benefits her execution a lot because she does only elements she is capable of doing perfectly (she took out her split 1/1 for example). She has a way better execution than Seda. However, I think this are also desicions, a good coach should do. I will never understand why Seda's coaches let her do both layout series when she always fell on one of them.

      Delete
    8. Hi I havent been on the blog for a few days but I will answer this in an upcoming post.

      Delete
    9. I'm eagerly looking forward to it ;)

      Delete

Post a Comment